Thursday 24 December 2015

Star Wars Episode 7: The Force Awakens - SPOILERS



Right, I’ve waited a week/couldn’t be bothered until now (delete as appropriate) to spoil the absolute Ewok out of this, so be warned: I’m about to make every plot point of this film more painfully obvious than some George Lucas romantic dialogue.

Although, I suppose for context I should rank each of the other six Star Wars movies out of ten beforehand, so FINE! Bear in mind, these are just my own personal enjoyment scores, not necessarily my opinion of their objective quality – so the nostalgia goggles are coming on.

A New Hope – 8.5/10
The Empire Strikes Back – 9/10
Return of the Jedi - 8/10
The Phantom Menace – 6.5/10
Attack of the Clones – 6.5/10
Revenge of the Sith – 7.5/10

Nostalgia goggles off, let’s go.

1.      Protagonist(s)
 
Rey, played by my wife (for all you know) Daisy Ridley, is a blend of Luke Skywalker and Princess Leia from the original trilogy. Abandoned on a desert planet as a child, she retains hope of their return and survives as a scavenger – finding odd bits and pieces and selling them for food. With Luke’s sense of wonder and desire to act, coupled with Leia’s proactivity and stubbornness, Rey is like-able, competent and fun; a perfect protagonist for a Star Wars film.  

I’ve heard some say she’s a Mary-Sue (too good at everything, with no struggle – she’s an ace pilot, a strong force user AND can defeat a trained ex-Jedi apprentice in her first lightsaber battle?), but let’s not forget Luke Skywalker infiltrated a high-security giant space station and then blew it up just days after leaving the sand-covered purgatory that is Tatooine.

John Boyega plays deserting Stormtrooper FN2187 (renamed Finn). While some of his characteristics are out of place – where did he get his sense of humour from? I thought he was trained his whole life to be a killer – Finn is a pretty unique character for a Star Wars film, in that he admits fear. He’s brave when he has literally no other choice, but he makes sure we know that the First Order (the remnants of the shattered Empire) aren’t to be taken lightly. 

From the opening scene where he experiences his first attack as a Stormtrooper and his reluctance to even fire his blaster, you appreciate his very human response to the orders he’s been given, and that makes him immediately stand out. When’s the last time we saw a Star Wars protagonist show fear? For me, Finn is one of two new characters who will help make this trilogy stand apart from what came before.

1 Mark

2.     Antagonist(s)
 Kylo Ren (played by Adam Driver) is the other stand out character. Everything about this guy was excellent – he was terrifying, intriguing and powerful, but also conflicted, burdened and surprising. Whereas the other two trilogies focussed on a protagonist trying to resist the dark, here we get a villain trying to resist the light, and that is something that hooks you right from the first scene where Max Von Sydow’s short-lived Lor San Tekka (yes, I had to Google that) teases us about Kylo Ren’s lineage. 

Although I would have preferred the actual reveal that he’s Han and Leia’s son, Ben Solo/Skywalker (a nice nod to Ben Kenobi), to have been saved for the confrontation on the bridge, I felt as though this is exactly how a kid raised by those two volatile characters would have ended up. How can you live up to war-hero parents? Especially when one is royalty! 

In short, I loved the design of the costume and the lightsaber – that both looked and was wielded like an actual sword, which makes sense seeing as he is a Knight of Ren. I loved the twist that he was all talk and bravado under a mask, but a character burdened by legacy without it, and I admire that the developers decided on a villain that would progress just like the hero over the course of the story, rather than being the finished article from the get-go.

1 Mark

3.       Secondary Characters

Oscar Isaac plays expert Resistance pilot Poe Dameron with the earnestness of Luke Skywalker and the confidence of Han Solo – another great blend of Original Trilogy characters. Whereas Rey and Finn seem to be making things up as they go along, Poe Dameron knows exactly what needs doing and is tough enough lead from the front doing it. He’s all charm and no smarm – take note, Solo.

Speaking of Han, the moment he bursts into frame with Chewbacca on the Millennium Falcon for the first time was one of the great ‘moments’ of the film. Unlike Indiana Jones 4, this isn’t an old Harrison Ford revisiting a role; this is Han Solo coming back after thirty-odd years. He’s still our favourite Nerf-herder but you can tell he’s seen some stuff, man, he’s seen some stuff. Watching him admit he was wrong about the force being all nonsense and his face drop when Finn mentions Luke Skywalker was the point in the film where it really started to feel like a Star Wars film. 

But come on, Han! Who walks out over a giant abyss on a long-ass bridge with no railings!?!

Chewbacca was used as effective comic-relief for the most part, but his reaction to Han’s death was enough to make you forget he’s actually just a really tall guy in a dog/bear costume who can barely walk. Kudos for getting a shot in on Kylo Ren, too. 

You don’t see much of Leia (now a General, not a Princess – seeing as she has no planet to claim sovereignty on… too soon? It’s been almost 40 years, Alderaan’s not coming back!), but I thought it was a good decision to have had her and Han drift apart between trilogies. They were never going to live happily-ever-after, regardless if they had a son who murdered a whole bunch of people or not – she’s a fighter and he’s a smuggler, and it was clever to have them fall back into old habits after losing their son. Sidenote: I appreciated Leia quoting Padme’s final words about Anakin to Han about their son; the prequels do count!

BB-8, in short, was brilliant. Not only does it avoid the difficulty of stuffing a person inside shuffling tin can – instead, being able to roll at speed – but he was adorable and hilarious. As long as you don’t contemplate the horror that someone has created yet another robot capable of human emotions like sadness and fear, but just focus on how cute his little lighter-thumbs-up was, everything will be fine.

Supreme Leader Snoke is the new bad guy working in the shadows, calling all the shots behind the First Order. I’ll save speculating on his identity for maybe another post (it’s totally Darth Plagueis, though), but Andy Serkis – as always – did an excellent job with the mo-cap role. We don’t really find out much about him and he doesn’t do anything except drop exposition and shout a bit, so the only point to bring up is that he fulfilled his role in the story and set up another mystery for the sequel.

JJ Abrams admitted that they only cast Gwendoline Christie as Captain Phasma late on in the game, and so her part was only ever a small one. A shame, considering how cool she looked and the possibility for another Boba Fett character was there for the taking, but that’s another improvement for the sequel to make. Although, she was like Boba Fett in that she was completely incompetent when it mattered; shutting down the Starkiller Base’s shields just because Finn threatened to shoot her – which he wouldn’t have done, let’s be honest. I do think it would have been a good idea to at least have her be the one who has the fight with Finn once he gets hold of the lightsaber, instead of just some random Stormtrooper with s stun-stick thing.

General Hux was awful. There’s not much else to be said here. He was just a cartoon. I guess JJ forgot to direct him. Maybe tone it down a notch, next time, Domhnall? You made Palpatine in Episode 3 look like a masterclass in subtlety.

0.75 of a Mark

4.       Plot

The plot, unfortunately felt a bit formulaic at times. If you were to bullet point the events of A New Hope then you could tick off the boxes while watching this one: Stormtrooper raid opening the film to introduce the villain, important information stored in a droid who encounters a force-sensitive young person on a desert planet, an old war hero helps them get the information where it needs to go before being killed by the villain who has a pre-existing relationship with them while the protagonist can only watch, and a big space station gets blown up but the villain survives. See what I mean? When the time comes to watch all nine main movies in sequence, by the time you get to 7 it will be hard not to think ‘didn’t I just watch this?’

I also found it weird how there were no giant star destroyers guarding the Starkiller Base. A case of arrogance, or a lapse in logic? Why not just have the heroes disable the super-weapon and keep the threat going into the next film? Where do they go from here – an even BIGGER Death Star?

It wasn’t all bad, though. The execution was fun and the doubts only sink in after repeated viewings (another questionable part was when Rey got so angry at Finn for wanting to flee after the meeting with Maz Kanata – the yellow one – when literally five minutes earlier she said she had to go back to Jakku when Han offered her a place on the Falcon).

Half a Mark

5.       Action
The action scenes were all spectacular. The aerial battles between the X-Wings and the Tie Fighters looked like someone had put the Original Trilogy dogfights through a Prequel Trilogy filter – it was the best of both worlds; the tangibility of the old with the scope of the new.

It was interesting to see new ways for the Force to be utilised as a weapon, as well. We’ve had pushes, lightning and choking before, but now Kylo Ren has introduced freezing someone on the spot and what looks like a mixture of mind-reading and putting physical pressure on the brain as a torture technique. Strange how he didn’t apply either of those skills to the lightsaber fight with Finn and Rey, but I got the impression he was toying with Finn and testing Rey – so that’s forgivable. 

A couple of things felt out of place, such as the sequence with the big monsters on Han’s ship – so much of the rest was practical that a CGI heavy chase stood out as a bit jarring – but all in all, there’s enough here to compete with the slew of set-piece heavy blockbusters that have spoiled us recently.

0.75 of a Mark

6.       Drama
I’ll admit it: got choked up a few times – which may or may not include the moment ‘a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away’ faded onto the screen. You know what? I’m just going to list them; because if there’s one thing the internet loves, its lists of things: the ‘Chewie, we’re home’ moment, Han’s reaction to hearing Luke’s name, Han and Leia’s reunion, Hans death and Leia/Chewbecca’s reaction to it, and then seeing old-man Luke Skywalker. So basically, whenever the old cast were on screen. 

The internal conflict within Ben Solo was also handled very well – as I mentioned earlier, we haven’t seen this kind of struggle in Star Wars before; the burden of the legacy of his parents and of his grandfather competing in his own mind to create a goal he’s never going to be able to reach. That kind of internal pressure could only ever push him to the dark side, and it’s going to be interesting to see what cost his inevitable return to the light will come at.

1 Mark

7.       Comedy

My only minor gripe with the humour was that there seemed to be a few too many Whedon-isms (Avengers style quips). Like Poe Dameron’s ‘Who talks first?’ bit with Kylo Ren – you just saw him stop a blaster bolt dead in mid-air with the force, and you’re making a joke? And Finn’s ‘Got a cute boyfriend?’ line to Rey seemed out of character for someone who’d been raised to kill. They were funny, but out of place, I felt.

Otherwise though, Han was charming, Chewbacca was utilised surprisingly effectively and BB-8 was so good that I’m sensing an R2-D2 heroic sacrifice to save Luke in the next film to keep the new guy front and centre while preventing the old-boy from being overshadowed.
0.75 of a Mark

8.       Romance

Although I felt the relationship between Finn and Rey was more of a friendship that will likely develop into a romance in future films, I include it here because they appeared to have genuine chemistry in a way that Anakin and Padme never did. They both saved each other a bunch of times and it was understandable why they wanted to stick together as the story progressed – at the expense of their individual aims. 

Obviously, seeing Han and Leia back on screen together was great. Just watching their body language, it was clear that they had drifted apart but still cared for each other. It was touching to see a character as snarky as Han become so sincere during those brief moments that when he was eventually killed by his son, it felt all the more devastating because we got to see a previously unseen side of him beforehand. 

1 Mark

9.       Pacing

Seeing as the plot was so similar to A New Hope, the pacing is pretty much the same, too. You get a big, flashy opening before settling down with the hero and a steady build to the finale. What this film does have over Episode 4, however, is that a lot of the times it appears to be slowing down, either one of the old faces gets reintroduced or we get a Kylo Ren tantrum. But there are some moments that drag which become clear with a second viewing, such as the meeting with Maz Kanata – i.e. Mos Eisley Cantina 2.0.

My other negative point with regards to the pacing is in relation to the sequence with the monsters on Han’s ship again – it felt like action for the sake of it just to hit the customary ten minute beat.

All you need to know is that I had no qualms holding in a wee from meeting Rey on Jakku to the end of the movie. I did the same thing with Revenge of the Sith a decade ago– I guess Star Wars just gets me excited.

Half a Mark

10.   Re-watch-ability

Look, if you care enough about this film to read a blog post by some nobody, then the chances are you’ve already seen it at least twice. The film is intriguing, surprising yet familiar, tons of fun, and everything you remember from the original film but with slightly less laggy moments in the middle.

If you get the chance, see it in IMAX 3D – I hate 3D usually but I honestly could tell the difference between this particular viewing and my 2D showing. See it as many times as you can in cinemas, because there was a time the thought of another Star Wars movie felt impossible.

1 Mark

Total Score: 8.25/10

Monday 14 September 2015

Legend - Movie Review




Right, I’ve not posted a review for a while so here’s the roundup of films I either saw too late or didn’t bother seeing but might be of some interest: 

Ant-Man – pretty damn good and somehow the second best Iron Man movie. 7.5/10
Man from UNCLE – wanted to see it but didn’t. I imagine it’s probably a 7/10, and I’ve never been wrong before.
Fant4stic – didn’t see it, didn’t want to see it and by all accounts it’s crap. I’ll give it a 4/10 for the sake of a pun.

Anyway, on to business.

1.                   Protagonist


Weird accent and violent role enthusiast Tom Hardy plays both of the Kray twins, but most of the film is based around Reggie Kray (the one in the red tie) – who has a normal cockney accent and is only a little bit violent… comparatively.

The main crux of the plot is the relationship which develops between Reggie and Frances Shea (played by Emily Browning – who you might remember from playing Violet Baudelaire in the A Series of Unfortunate Events film they should have made a sequel to), and how his life as a gangster is affected by it.

The character is romanticised quite a bit so the audience actually likes him – he is a violent criminal, after all – but the charisma seems well earned and you buy that he’s the leader of his gang and community.

1 Mark

2.                   Antagonist



Christopher Ecclestone (aka no-one’s favourite Doctor Who) plays the copper who’s charged with investigating the Kray twins, and if you’ve seen Peaky Blinders then his character will feel very familiar to Sam Neill’s Northern Irish policeman – in fact, the tone of this movie is quite similar to that show and a few actors cross over, including Tom Hardy (duh) and Paul Anderson (who played the moustachioed Arthur Shelby). There’s also a cameo from Welsh pop-star Duffy, but that’s not particularly important.

Where was I? Oh, yeah – so crap Doctor Who only really has a small role in the film, seeing as they’ve got to give Tom Hardy two roles as well as a love interest and find time to flesh out his gang, but with the limited screen time he’s given he does a serviceable job. Nothing spectacular, but there’s a scene where he explains to Reggie Kray exactly why he’s got such a hard-on for him and his brother and the motivation and sense of conflict is interesting – it’s just a shame it wasn’t really expanded on in more depth.

Half a Mark

3.                   Secondary Characters

Ronnie Kray (again, played by Tom Hardy) is the mentally unstable and pretty much psychopathic twin brother of Reggie – and he’s also the source of most of the films funny moments. For all the efforts Reggie makes to move their enterprise in more legitimate directions, Ronnie seems determined to maintain the gangster aspect of their existence. I don’t want to spoil too much about Ronnie’s part in the film, as much of the plot revolved around his interactions with his brother.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Tom Hardy is the best British actor working today. He may pick eccentric roles and make some odd choices, but watching Legend you sometimes have to remind yourself that he’s playing both roles – he’s that good that it feels like its two completely different actors. Sitting in the second row from the front, you could see each twin even has different teeth! 

Frances Shea is the love interest that the emotional core of the film hangs on, but sometimes it’s hard to empathise with her. The movie does a great job of showing the development of the romance, but when times inevitably get hard you do sit there and think ‘hey, you knew he was a violent criminal gangster from the moment you met him’. Of course, that doesn’t excuse Reggie’s abusive behaviour but it almost glamorises domestic violence by having the audience get back on Reggie’s side after everything comes crashing down.

All in all, Emily Browning does a great job in the role you do sympathise with and like the character a lot.

1 Mark

4.                   Plot

The story begins with the Kray twins already established in the East End; Ronnie is in psychiatric care (not for long) and Reggie is keeping the community and his club ticking over, while charmingly dealing with determined police. So no origin story about how Tom Hardy was bitten by two radioactive criminals, causing him to split in two, unfortunately.

Throughout the film, there’s a great balance of humour, violence and romance that should appease most general audiences. The running time is fairly long, but the story is interesting enough and the performances dynamic enough that you never look at your phone to check the time.

The only real issue is that there’s not much of a conclusion except a voice-over and some bullet points about what happened to the Kray twins in later life – which would have been fine if Ronnie was given any sort of closure on his side of the story. As it stands, Reggie gets a full plot thread, but Ronnie is just kind of there to watch.

Half a Mark

5.                   Action



Like most Tom Hardy films, there’s a few great punch ups in Legend. Who needs to see skyscrapers come crashing down when you can see Tom Hardy bottle Tom Hardy over the head?

The best action scene of the film is when the twins attend what was slated as peace-meeting between their gang and a rival one. I won’t spoil what happens but it starts of hilarious and ends brutally.
There’s not an overload of fight scenes, but the three main ones are very satisfying and well crafted. Some people might complain that there wasn’t as much action as they’d anticipated, but this is a case of quality over quantity. 

So, a paranoid schizophrenic walks into a bar…

1 Mark

6.                   Drama

The main dramatic beats centre around the relationships between Reggie and Frances, and the twins themselves.

It’s established early on that both Ronnie and Frances are mentally fragile – Ronnie more obviously and dangerously so. You almost get the feeling there’s going to be an ‘Of Mice and Men’ moment between the two brothers (or a Carol and Lizzie moment, for you Walking Dead fans out there), but rightly or wrongly, Reggie’s loyalty pervades and the consequences for such an apparently unbreakable bond between two violent people prove disastrous for anyone connected to them.

As the film goes on and Reggie and Frances move past the honeymoon period, the reality of life alongside a criminal eventually sets in. Broken promises, legal problems, feelings of inadequacy and isolation become Frances fate until she finds her resolve – however misguided it ends up being.
As fun as the film is, it’s a biopic, so don’t necessarily expect a happy ending.

1 Mark

7.                   Comedy

As said earlier, most of the comedic moments come from Ronnie Kray and his love of being a celebrity-like gangster. And his sexuality – there’s a few scarily funny moments centred around that aspect of Ronnie, too.

There’s not really much I can elaborate on in regards to the film’s sense of humour – much of it is character and plot related, so discussing it in any kind of depth would potentially spoil aspects of the story.

All I’ll say is don’t bring a rolling pin to a shootout.

1 Mark

8.                   Romance



The romance is the main focus of the story, and it plays out very well. You see how and why Reggie and Frances fall for each other and how why things fall apart. I mentioned earlier that occasionally it was difficult to empathise with Frances, due to her knowingly getting involved with a violent criminal, but if you can’t sympathise with all of her actions, you at least can with her motivations and the decisions she takes.

Certain moments may make you doubt whether Reggie really cared for Frances at all, but the finale of the film makes absolutely sure you know he did, even if it doesn’t excuse the pain he caused her.

1 Mark

9.                   Pacing

The film has a pretty weak voice over from Frances Shea, which could have been cut in all honesty – it doesn’t add much that the scenes don’t already deliver visually. I said before that the running time seemed quite long for a general audience, even if the level of interest never really drops.

The pacing throughout the film’s middle is spot on, but the voice over slows down the beginning and the end just sort of cuts off, so I can’t give out a full mark – I’m not made of them, you know!

Half a Mark

10.               Re-watch-ability

If you’re a Tom Hardy fan, it is definitely worth another watch, even if just to try and spot the subtle mannerisms in his duel performance that separates each twin. There’s enough engaging dialogue, action and humour to make you want to come back for another viewing while it’s still on the big screen.

But then again, if you’re the kind of person who prefers the more lavish big-screen affairs (aka a Tom Hardy hater), perhaps a film so performance based only really warrants a single watch before the DVD release.

Half a Mark

All in all, Legend is a pretty damn good film and you won’t leave disappointed.

Final Score: 8/10

Wednesday 15 July 2015

Hidden Villains of the Batman v Superman Trailer



WARNING: If it turns out I’m right – and I always am – then this post contains potential spoilers for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, and Batman Arkham Knight.

No matter how many times I watch that trailer, I still don’t quite believe this film is really happening. I’m betting the apocalypse kicks off about two weeks before the release date, just to spite me. But anyway, I’m not going to gush about how amazing the trailer is (you’ve got your own eyes), this post is going to briefly examine the villains possibly hidden in between the cuts and punches.

What, you didn’t think they weren’t going to team up at the end, did you?

Anyway, first up, the most heavily rumoured to appear: Doomsday.
This Kryptonian monstrosity is most famous for appearing in the story arc The Death of Superman, in which – spoiler alert, I guess – Superman ‘dies’ by way of being beaten to death in a cross-country brawl with Doomsday, who is also killed. In the comics, Doomsday was created by a scientist and released on a prehistoric Krypton, where it died due to the atmospheric conditions. The idea behind the character is that he can never be killed the same way twice, as the scientist would collect his remains and create a stronger clone by removing the weakness that resulted in his death – a sort of forced evolution. Eventually Doomsday murdered his creator, stole a spacecraft and crash-landed on Earth and remained buried for centuries until waking up, resulting in Superman having to stop his reign of wanton destruction.
In terms of his possible appearance in Batman v Superman, we see in the trailer that General Zod’s corpse has been retrieved and brought to Lexcorp for examination. In this movie universe, many people blame Superman for the destruction of large parts of Metropolis in Man of Steel, and no doubt Lex Luthor is one of them. The rumour is that in an effort to convince the world that Superman is a threat and deserves to be hated, Luthor experiments on Zod’s body – possibly using the Kryptonite also shown in the trailer – and either reanimates the corpse or creates Doomsday. This would then result in Batman and Superman teaming up and give us our introduction to Wonder Woman.

The clues for Doomsday are there: the apparent destruction of a Lexcorp facility as if something powerful had broken out, the burning lands the Batwing (or Wonder Woman’s jet?) is seen flying over, and the massive blast of what is edited to look like Superman’s heat vision narrowly missing Batman – but notice how focused and thin his heat vision is here…
compared to the uncontrolled and fiery beam shown here…
No matter how annoyed Superman is at Batman (who also notice is not wearing his battle armour at that point in the trailer, as he does when shown fighting Superman), he is not going to reduce him to an ash smear on the wall – he’s a pretty good bloke that way.

Next up: The Red Hood
The Red Hood was an identity the Joker may or have not have used (depending if you trust his honesty in retelling his origin story, as seen in Alan Moore’s The Killing Joke) and was adopted by the back-from-the-dead Jason Todd – the second Robin, murdered by the Joker.

In the comics, Todd returns from the grave thanks to Superboy punching a hole in the time-space continuum (comics can be dumb sometimes), but in the animated adaptation, Ra’s Al Ghul steals his corpse and dips it into a Lazarus Pit (a rejuvenating pool he uses to cheat death, but which also greatly affects the mind) as an apology to Batman for hiring the Joker for a job which inadvertently ended with Robin being beaten to death. Shit happens, you know? The Pit brought Jason back from the dead, but sent him insane and he escaped, to begin plotting his revenge against Batman for not only failing to save him, but for not killing the Joker in revenge and stop his body count piling up.

A new version of the story was the main plot-line of the new video game Batman Arkham Knight, where it is revealed that the Joker never killed Jason, but held him prisoner in an abandoned wing of Arkham Asylum to torture him before faking his death and sending Batman the video. Todd returned with a military force and help from the Scarecrow in a bid to finally defeat Batman and get revenge for apparently leaving him to die and replacing him.
In the Batman v Superman, we see an apparently burned Robin costume with a taunt from the Joker sprayed onto it in the Batcave, as Bruce Wayne contemplates becoming Batman again – the shots of him staring down the Batsuit imply he has been retired for a while, as in The Dark Knight Returns graphic novel by Frank Miller where Batman also retired partly due to Jason Todd’s death.
We also see a newspaper in Bruce Wayne’s hands with the message ‘YOU LET YOUR FAMILY DIE’ scrawled across it. Some have suggested it could be a relative of one of the Wayne Financial employees who died in the Superman vs Zod fight, but why would it say ‘YOUR FAMILY’ and not ‘MY’ or ‘OUR’ family? Others have suggested it’s the Joker taunting Bruce, but the Joker doesn’t know or care who Batman is in pretty much every iteration of the character – plus, in The Dark Knight Returns the Joker is catatonic during Batman’s retirement and only wakes up when he hears about his return, a factor which may or may not be used in the film.
There are a few quick shots of Batman wearing some kind of desert gear and fighting with a militia emblazoned with Superman’s logo on their arm. But if you look closely, that doesn’t look like Ben Affleck under the cowl, and Batman doesn’t usually snap a guy’s neck like that (what with his no-killing rule and all). Compare that few seconds of footage to how the Red Hood is usually portrayed – has no problem killing, uses Batman’s tactics but with a lethal edge and he wears more militaristic attire including a brown jacket over his costume. It’s possible that is Jason Todd under the cowl, trying to defame Batman by leaving a trail of bodies killed by someone wearing a Batsuit, after taunting him from afar about the deaths in Metropolis. 

With it recently being announced that Ben Affleck with direct and co-write (as well as star) in the next solo Batman film in 2018, and with Jared Leto’s Joker being introduced in next year Suicide Squad movie as well as the Robin costume prominently on display in the trailer for this film, I wouldn’t be too surprised if the Under the Red Hood storyline is the one chosen for adaptation. It may only be introduced as an ongoing mystery in Batman v Superman first, with it left unanswered who sent that taunt on the newspaper and who is possibly masquerading as the fake Batman, as setup for that solo outing.

Finally, I have two unlikely options. One: Metallo.

Ignore the gorilla.

It was rumoured a while ago that Callan Mulvey could be playing Metallo; a Superman bad guy who’s a sort of cyborg thing that is powered by a Kryptonite heart. Because of that, he’s a tough opponent for Superman but probably easy pickings for Wonder Woman, so I don’t expect to see him in this film – even though Zack Snyder did recently admit that Metallo was in contention for the villainous role should they have chosen to do a standalone Man of Steel sequel. Plus, Metallo doesn’t have heat vision, so this would mean it was indeed Superman who tried to wipe Batman off the face of the Earth.

Option Two: Battle Armour Lex Luthor.
We know that Batman’s battle armour for fighting Superman will be Kryptonite infused, and there have been rumours that along with General Zod’s corpse, his military battle armour was also retrieved. Perhaps Lex Luthor has tweaked it and uses it to attack the Trinity once he realises they have cottoned on to his manipulations, and that heat vision blast was actually some kind of laser weapon. After all, the first official image of Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor showed him with a shaved head (I'd say bald, but you can still see hair follicles or whatever) and wearing a prison jumpsuit.



If I had to guess, I’d say it’s Doomsday or a reanimated Zod that unites the three heroes, and I’d also put money on Jason Todd’s Red Hood to be the villain of the standalone Batman film – even if that message on the newspaper was from the Joker.